<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: Puritan´s Empire by Charles A. Coulombe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://corjesusacratissimum.org/2010/01/book-review-puritan%c2%b4s-empire-by-charles-a-coulombe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://corjesusacratissimum.org/2010/01/book-review-puritan%c2%b4s-empire-by-charles-a-coulombe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:11:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blind Faith in the Dogmatic Authority of Secularism</title>
		<link>http://corjesusacratissimum.org/2010/01/book-review-puritan%c2%b4s-empire-by-charles-a-coulombe/comment-page-1/#comment-2542</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Faith in the Dogmatic Authority of Secularism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corjesusacratissimum.org/?p=813#comment-2542</guid>
		<description>[...] I have recently reviewed books of the same period of history by Charles Coulombe and Donal Anthony Foley. These will be seen as less reliable than the tome from the OUP. They will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have recently reviewed books of the same period of history by Charles Coulombe and Donal Anthony Foley. These will be seen as less reliable than the tome from the OUP. They will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lost Piety of Catholic France (Part I)</title>
		<link>http://corjesusacratissimum.org/2010/01/book-review-puritan%c2%b4s-empire-by-charles-a-coulombe/comment-page-1/#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lost Piety of Catholic France (Part I)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corjesusacratissimum.org/?p=813#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>[...] process was somewhat gentler elsewhere. Still as I have recently indicated in my review of Charles A. Coulombe´s Puritan´s Empire, there is much to indicate everywhere the efforts towards clearing the ground &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] process was somewhat gentler elsewhere. Still as I have recently indicated in my review of Charles A. Coulombe´s Puritan´s Empire, there is much to indicate everywhere the efforts towards clearing the ground &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cor Jesu Sacratissimum » Remember Christ Our Saviour &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://corjesusacratissimum.org/2010/01/book-review-puritan%c2%b4s-empire-by-charles-a-coulombe/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Cor Jesu Sacratissimum » Remember Christ Our Saviour &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corjesusacratissimum.org/?p=813#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>[...] A. Coulombe has written a powerful book, Puritan´s Empire which will be shortly reviewed at this site. In it, he counsels Catholics to do all they can to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A. Coulombe has written a powerful book, Puritan´s Empire which will be shortly reviewed at this site. In it, he counsels Catholics to do all they can to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://corjesusacratissimum.org/2010/01/book-review-puritan%c2%b4s-empire-by-charles-a-coulombe/comment-page-1/#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corjesusacratissimum.org/?p=813#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>Thank you yet again Edwin for gracing our site with your insight.

Yes I agree there is indeed such a conservative American Protestantism that seems far removed from an America of &quot;Deist and Masonic influences&quot; as you say. Frequently I find a moving piety in this aspect to America and was perhaps amiss in not acknowledging the beauty I do see here.  In its own way it too resists the stripping of values and God from public life.

At the same time, while I am hardly an expert on American history, I don´t feel this element disproves what I believe Coulombe is saying - that in the Northeast particularly, Puritanism established ground where a deeply de-Catholicised form of Christianity led to any further innovations.

I think he would say then that the congregationalism that you mention for example, grew up in a Puritan context and then morphed into Unitarianism in many instances ... 

Once one has eliminated the Catholic dogmas, one is free to move further and further away, including towards a Unitarian conception of God which approaches Masonry significantly enough to be embraced by it. A la Jefferson ...

And I believe he would also draw an important distinction between the religious impulses of the Revolutionaries who won and established the American matrix versus the differing impulses of the Loyalists, which I believe he is saying would be more High Church, if not Catholic.

I have purposefully couched this response in phrases like &quot;&lt;em&gt;I think&lt;/em&gt;&quot; because I do not want to claim authority I do not have. I lack time to say more, but perhaps this from his book is not without value here:

&quot;In New England, due to Puritanism, Loyalist strength was tenuous ... Unhampered by Puritanism New York was the bastion of the Loyalist cause in the North, particularly among the Scots Catholics [and] among the less assimilated Dutch speakers of the Hudson Valley.&quot;

Finally although I am sometimes a little slow in responding to comments, I would like to say Kim and I appreciate these &lt;em&gt;very much &lt;/em&gt;and if you care to, would appreciate hearing from more of you who are following this site.

One can even comment anonymously if wished, simply by putting anonymous in the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you yet again Edwin for gracing our site with your insight.</p>
<p>Yes I agree there is indeed such a conservative American Protestantism that seems far removed from an America of &#8220;Deist and Masonic influences&#8221; as you say. Frequently I find a moving piety in this aspect to America and was perhaps amiss in not acknowledging the beauty I do see here.  In its own way it too resists the stripping of values and God from public life.</p>
<p>At the same time, while I am hardly an expert on American history, I don´t feel this element disproves what I believe Coulombe is saying &#8211; that in the Northeast particularly, Puritanism established ground where a deeply de-Catholicised form of Christianity led to any further innovations.</p>
<p>I think he would say then that the congregationalism that you mention for example, grew up in a Puritan context and then morphed into Unitarianism in many instances &#8230; </p>
<p>Once one has eliminated the Catholic dogmas, one is free to move further and further away, including towards a Unitarian conception of God which approaches Masonry significantly enough to be embraced by it. A la Jefferson &#8230;</p>
<p>And I believe he would also draw an important distinction between the religious impulses of the Revolutionaries who won and established the American matrix versus the differing impulses of the Loyalists, which I believe he is saying would be more High Church, if not Catholic.</p>
<p>I have purposefully couched this response in phrases like &#8220;<em>I think</em>&#8221; because I do not want to claim authority I do not have. I lack time to say more, but perhaps this from his book is not without value here:</p>
<p>&#8220;In New England, due to Puritanism, Loyalist strength was tenuous &#8230; Unhampered by Puritanism New York was the bastion of the Loyalist cause in the North, particularly among the Scots Catholics [and] among the less assimilated Dutch speakers of the Hudson Valley.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally although I am sometimes a little slow in responding to comments, I would like to say Kim and I appreciate these <em>very much </em>and if you care to, would appreciate hearing from more of you who are following this site.</p>
<p>One can even comment anonymously if wished, simply by putting anonymous in the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Shendelman</title>
		<link>http://corjesusacratissimum.org/2010/01/book-review-puritan%c2%b4s-empire-by-charles-a-coulombe/comment-page-1/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Shendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corjesusacratissimum.org/?p=813#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>I cannot offer a detailed and coherent response to the above for I am confused about the motives of the Colonists who chose the Revolution.   But I can venture a few comments:

The world of today would be as alien and alienating to my Loyalist ancestors (Mother&#039;s side) who were Protestants of various stripes, as it would the Catholic.   The superficiality and impiety of this culture would be deeply offensive to them.

The Loyalists and the Revolutionaries were more than Anglo leading to an Anglo-American matrix but were a mix of English, German and Dutch settlers at that time.   Many were Protestant non-conformists of various stripes...not only Calvinist-type Puritans.   You had Quakers, Behmenists, Anabaptists, Congregationalists, Anglicans and many others.

Conservative, Evangelical Protestant Christians in today&#039;s U.S. feel their culture is betraying the Christianity that undergirds America.   The Deist and Masonic influences are notwithstanding in how they feel America is deeply and profoundly Christian.

My point is: No Christianity of any stripe would share a bed with this culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot offer a detailed and coherent response to the above for I am confused about the motives of the Colonists who chose the Revolution.   But I can venture a few comments:</p>
<p>The world of today would be as alien and alienating to my Loyalist ancestors (Mother&#8217;s side) who were Protestants of various stripes, as it would the Catholic.   The superficiality and impiety of this culture would be deeply offensive to them.</p>
<p>The Loyalists and the Revolutionaries were more than Anglo leading to an Anglo-American matrix but were a mix of English, German and Dutch settlers at that time.   Many were Protestant non-conformists of various stripes&#8230;not only Calvinist-type Puritans.   You had Quakers, Behmenists, Anabaptists, Congregationalists, Anglicans and many others.</p>
<p>Conservative, Evangelical Protestant Christians in today&#8217;s U.S. feel their culture is betraying the Christianity that undergirds America.   The Deist and Masonic influences are notwithstanding in how they feel America is deeply and profoundly Christian.</p>
<p>My point is: No Christianity of any stripe would share a bed with this culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
